Here is an interesting article from the English edition of the German magazine, Der Spiegel. http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/naked-nazis-book-reveals-extent-of-third-reich-body-worship-a-768641.html, on the existence of a popular, coffee table book of nudes published in Nazi Germany. As something which promoted Nazi ideals of Germanic beauty, it was approved by the totalitarian state censors.
Apparently, the rather sexually conservative world of Nazi Germany, idealized nude photos of perfect Aryan specimens were acceptable. The Nazi state made it quite clear that procreation was the sole purpose of sex. After all, it was important for the Fuhrer to have as many little potential Nazi soldiers to fight his wars as possible. Women existed, therefore, to produce babies, and take care of domestic concerns. And yet, as is usually the case with outwardly sexually conservative states and organizations, there was a strange sexual subculture to the Third Reich. For instance, one of Hitler’s closest associates, and rivals, Ernst Rohm, was a homosexual pedophile. In 1934 Hitler had him executed during his “Night of the Long Knives” purging of National Socialist party rivals. Hitler eliminated him not because he was a homosexual, but because he was a threat to Hitler’s power.
To quote the article:
What did Germans read during the Nazi era? In search of the answer, author Christian Adam surveyed a total of 350 bestsellers from the 12 years of the Third Reich’s existence — making striking discoveries in the process. In addition to well-known propaganda books like Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” and Alfred Rosenberg’s “The Myth of the Twentieth Century,” there were schmaltzy regional novels, science fiction, mysteries, love stories, joke books and cross-media marketed accompaniments to radio programs and films.
The rich variety of reading material likely arose because different censorship offices competed to have the last word on what books publishers could print, Christian says. The paradoxical effect is that some of the books printed seem surprising today. Perhaps the oddest of them all was Hans Surén’s “Mensch und Sonne,” or “Humans and Sun,” a collection of nude photographs that includes lyrical praise of the male member, instructions for yoga-like exercises and even naked skiing.
Lyrical praise of the male member? In Nazi Germany? Interesting.
The article goes on, citing how this nudism from Nazi Germany actually foreshadows later developments in sexuality.
It could be seen as a precursor to the sexual revolution and “Freikörperkultur (FKK),” or “free body culture” of the late 1960s, if it weren’t so blatantly racist, researcher Adam told SPEIGEL ONLINE in an interview.
Adam later stated in the interview:
The book states that, “the love life can never be tied to marriage alone,” and that, “in the past the biggest personalities held as little regard for religious and middle-class values as the masses.” It also says that “free sexual love is therefore accepted in a way similar to how it was among the Germanic forefathers.”
What makes these nudes interesting is that they were approved by the Third Reich censors. They were not underground. Yet, in some parts of the U.S today, and especially by certain religious groups, these images would be considered “porn” and banned from viewing. They would be considered sinful and evil. Having them on your computer at work would probably get you fired. So even the Nazis, like many repressed conservatives today, had this strange conflict between traditional notions of sexual purity and a desire for sexual freedom and exploration, and a desire to view images of nude, physical beauty. Life never changes.
littlepdog said:
mind=blown
Kaziklu said:
I think you are mistaken at one point. Judging from old alchemical texts and various traditions from the Middle Ages (and the shadowy time before it) Nazism didn’t invent anything new in terms of sexuality. For instance the holding of marriage in low regard as oppossed to burning love for a woman out of wedlock was a merit, a proof of virility in a higher sense. Passion and love of life were at the heart of Germany’s sexual mores at the time – the political explanations of this fact are mere a posteriori conclusions, just a reflexive consequence of the human urge to explain and know. They’re not suitable for a full understanding of the topic. You should read Julius Evola, perhaps he will shed some light on the subject for you.
Have a nice day and best wishes from Croatia.
Racer X said:
Kaziklu,
Thanks for the comment. I am not quite sure what you are saying here, but thanks for commenting anyway. What I find interesting here is the Nazi use of nude imagery to promote their agenda, something which some people today might find surprising. Today there are those who would consider such images as “porn”. When it comes to sexual imagery, there are some today in the US who are more ready to censor than even the Nazis.
stonerwithaboner said:
nazi’s homoerotic you say???
http://gaynazis.com/
stonerwithaboner said:
this link has upset Chuck Crudd and many WN’s who inhabit the man-0-sphere:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-two/7961211/Hitler-had-Jewish-and-African-roots-DNA-tests-show.html
Racer X said:
Stoner,
Thanks for links…they are quite interesting, especially the one about Hitler’s own racial DNA. One of the funny things about the Nazis is how un-Teutonic many of the top Nazi’s, such as Hitler, Himmler and Goebbels, appeared. They were physically far from their own stated racial ideals.
stonerwithaboner said:
…and have you seen Fartiste say Hitler was beta???
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/08/26/hitler-was-beta/
The man-0-sphere is such a funny place…
stonerwithaboner said:
oh and since you like naked ladies, here’s some pix of one that doesn’t meet the aryan beauty standard but I like quite a bit…
http://wagastalaga.blogspot.com/2010/04/techie-agbayanis-nude-playboy-pictures.html
oh, well, Chuck Crudd can have Jack Don-0-van and all the real men…
Racer X said:
Stoner,
Thanks for the link about Hitler as a beta…quite interesting!
And the girl in the link is quite hot too…
Just no said:
Rohm was not executed because he was a threat to Hitler’s power. Rohm was on the outs because he was a homosexual, which people were not going to tolerate, and he was also more of a lefty. This nonsense tries to imply that being a gay pedo was A-OK with Hitler and the Nazis, but that is ahistorical nonsense.
Racer X said:
Just No,
Thanks for the comment.
While I do not claim to be any sort of historical expert on the Third Reich, from what I have read about Rohm does suggest that Hitler removed him because he and his organization, the SA, had become too powerful for Hitler and the more conservative industrial and military supporters of the regime. From all accounts I have read, Hitler did not care that much about the fact that he was a homosexual.
For instance, Heinrich Hoffman, one of the few people that was a true friend of Hitler, and Hitler’s photographer, in his memoir, “Hitler Was My Friend”, quotes Hitler on Roehm, specifically regarding his known homosexuality.
“In a man like Roehm, who has lived so long in the tropics, a disease like this–for it is a disease that I prefer to regard his habits–deserves special consideration. With his Army connections, Roehm is very valuable to the Party, and, as long as he remains discreet about things, his private life is of no interest to me; and I certainly should never think of reproaching him or of taking any action against him.”
In public the Nazi’s condemned homosexuality, but it seems in private they tolerated it among their members, so long as those members were useful to the cause. Roehm had become a threat for other reasons, and from what I can tell that was the reason Hitler had him killed, and had his SA greatly reduced in power. If Hitler had been disgusted by Roehm’s homosexuality to the point of wanting to remove him, he certainly would have done so long before 1934.