Here is an interesting blog, from an Egyptian woman, a 20-year-old college student named Aliaa Magda Elmahdy. http://arebelsdiary.blogspot.com/?zx=ed093cc531978182 I found about from Ferds other site, “In Bona Fide”. As well as containing nudes photographs of herself, it contains both erotic art and photography from and by Egyptians.
According to Jezebel: “20-year-old college student Aliaa Magda Elmahdy has sparked outrage in Egypt by posting naked photos of herself to her blog as a protest against the country’s conservative culture. She says she’s upholding the spirit of the revolution, but in addition to conservative Islamists, she’s angered liberals who believe the scandal will hurt them during the country’s parliamentary election next week, the first since President Hosni Mubarak was ousted.”
The blog has only one entry from late October, but already has 1.5 million views.
I am not sure what the exact political situation is in Egypt right now, and there is certainly the real threat of an Islamist state taking hold, but this blog shows how people from all over the world, even in societies that are drenched in religious fundamentalism, desire to express eroticism in different ways. I am sure there must be other blogs of this nature out there in such societies, but this is the first I have seen. The phenomena of eroticism is part of human nature. We see it in all times, all places, all throughout history.
As the New York times reports, she expresses her reasons for her blog in a statement:
“Try nude models who worked in Fine Art Faculties in the early 1970s, hide all art books and smash naked archaeological statues,” read the statement, alluding to some recent protests staged here by ultra-conservative Islamists known as Salafis. “Then take off your clothes and look at yourselves in the mirror, then burn your body that you so despise to get rid of your sexual complexes forever, before subjecting me to your bigoted insults or denying my freedom of expression.”
As I have written recently on this blog, I believe religious fundamentalism is a dire threat to our world today, both politically, intellectually, and culturally. She is reporting in this statement how the religious nut cases in Egypt are smashing naked archeological statues, burning art books, and trying nude models. As I wrote in my post on Michelangelo’s David recently, the religious fanatics in this country, Catholic and Protestant, The Legion of Christ cultists and the Opus Dei wackos, would not hesitate to do the same things to art works here that they deemed offensive.
I have a friend who is Egyptian. A few months ago on a warm, late summer day we were both enjoying the visual pleasures of different women. It was a jovial occasion, one that reveals how men are really the same, no matter where they come from. All men enjoy the sights of attractive women.
Only the religious fundamentalist fanatics of today are adamantly opposed to the pursuit or expression of eroticism in different forms. They will destroy everything they deem offensive. They will even kill you if they find you offensive. After all, they hang homosexuals in Iran, for simply being gay. If you convert to Christianity in Saudi Arabia, you can be executed.

More loveliness. The religious conservatives who want to eliminate such beautiful images can go fuck themselves.
The fight for true freedom in our time is now against religious fundamentalist conservatives. Let them gain power, and they will take away your freedoms, even your life, all in the name of their God.
willcrimson said:
Show me a country without pornography, and I’ll show you a country where women have no rights.
CL said:
There are a couple of nicely done photos on that blog post. I like the B&W one with the bodies. Yet more evidence that women want to be looked at – who’da thunk!
7man said:
It is official according to Mairin, “yes Racer you are a purveyor of porn.” Certainly by any rational criteria, the B&W was just plain nudity and not pornographic. Yet to those with uptight sensibilities it is probably craven, even though I thought it lovely and did not get aroused. Of course you know men can often appreciate a beautiful woman without a physical arousal reaction. Most women do not seem to understand this.
CL said:
I left this comment on my post and I’m going to repeat it here:
It’s pretty sad when someone can’t tell the difference between eroticism and pornography. Guess we’d better get rid of the Sistene Chapel then, since that place is full of teh pr0n! Also, better burn Song of Songs, Dark Night of the Soul… Oh, but those are “metaphorical” – so why use sex as a metaphor? I can answer that! Because sex is awesome and even prudes get aroused thinking about it so it makes for a very strong metaphor that will stick in your mind. Plus everybody knows Song of Songs is about the erotic love between a man and a woman – and this is as it should be.
I’d sooner be a Pagan than an uptight Catholic. These are the people who alienate others and put people off Catholicism. Also, the way to fight porn is by showing natural nudity. It’s the antidote to porn. If that weren’t true, why would so much Catholic art have so much nudity? Why hasn’t the Sistene Chapel been repainted? We look at nudity in art and it isn’t arousing and it makes most pornography look trashy and crass. Nudity is not a sin! Modesty is what is in the heart, not the clothes you wear. Chastity according to one’s station in life. Eroticism is not necessarily an offence against chastity.
These are complex issues that deserve further discussion but I invite people here (especially Mairin) to think about these things – I mean really think, don’t dismiss out of hand just because you have a negative emotional reaction.
Racer X said:
Will,
Yes, nice statement. I agree completely.
Racer X said:
@7man: “Of course you know men can often appreciate a beautiful woman without a physical arousal reaction. Most women do not seem to understand this.”
Yes, this is quite true. I can appreciate a nice nude and it is not necessarily an experience which causes arousal.
And it is nice to know that I am now officially a “purveyor of porn”. haha…
CL,
Thanks for the comment. I am enjoying the “discussion” over at your blog!
Butterfly Flower said:
I’d sooner be a Pagan than an uptight Catholic. These are the people who alienate others and put people off Catholicism.
Growing up, the only flavor of Catholicism I ever was exposed to was the “uptight” kind. It just led me to gravitate towards my father’s faith, and eventually jump ship and join my boyfriend’s denomination of Christianity.
Also, the way to fight porn is by showing natural nudity. It’s the antidote to porn. If that weren’t true, why would so much Catholic art have so much nudity? Why hasn’t the Sistene Chapel been repainted? We look at nudity in art and it isn’t arousing and it makes most pornography look trashy and crass. Nudity is not a sin! Modesty is what is in the heart, not the clothes you wear. Chastity according to one’s station in life. Eroticism is not necessarily an offence against chastity.
I don’t feel like my naked body is sexual. When I wear outfits, I don’t dress like a streetwalker; however I also don’t hide my body with baggy shirts and dark tights.
For awhile, I felt like a chastity failure. Even though I am a virgin, my normal healthy non-shamed filled body image rendered me unchaste. I would think “How could I not feel ashamed of myself” if I wore a bikini to the beach.
Also, I never really got over the irony of being preached chastity while wearing a Catholic schoolgirl uniform. I’m wearing a tartan mini-skirt and knee-highs… & you expect me to not turn guys on?
Nestorius said:
“I’d sooner be a Pagan than an uptight Catholic.”
Catholics are pagans. In fact, all Christians, Jews, Muslims and the rest are still pagans. You see, nothing changed, paganism was replaced with something similar under another name, but in practice it is still the same thing.
Racer X said:
Butterfly,
“For awhile, I felt like a chastity failure. Even though I am a virgin, my normal healthy non-shamed filled body image rendered me unchaste. I would think “How could I not feel ashamed of myself” if I wore a bikini to the beach.”
I think it is quite possible to sexual, and still be chaste. Being a sexual person does not necessarily mean acting out on our sexual desires, but only accepting that they are there, and not trying to repress them. Too often too many people go to either one extreme or the other.
“Also, I never really got over the irony of being preached chastity while wearing a Catholic schoolgirl uniform. I’m wearing a tartan mini-skirt and knee-highs… & you expect me to not turn guys on?”
Haha…yes, the Catholic school girl uniform is a common male fantasy!